Thoughts for the DayWe need now more than ever to have the courage to look the truth in the eye and to call things by their proper name. Especially in the case of abortion there is a widespread use of ambiguous terminology, such as "interruption of pregnancy", which tends to hide abortion's reality. But no word has the power to change the reality of things: procured abortion is the deliberate and direct killing of a human being. Upcoming events
|
ROCKFORD LIFE REPORT For Apr 23 08What is the Rockford Life Report? ; 26 baby’s die in Rockford past wk; Expelled Movie Exposes Planned Parenthood's Pro-Abortion M.O.; Black Pro-Life Leader: Why Are Shepherds Leading the Sheep to Slaughter? ; Abortion Causes Severe Depression and Loss of Esteem in Women; Sex-Selective Abortion in America ; Guatemalans "Dumbfounded" and Angered by International "Culture of Death"…. What is the Rockford Life Report? There is a major civil rights case in Rockford, Il. in which the civil rights of the local community have been violated. On April 3, 2008 a civil rights case was filed against the city of Rockford on behalf of local citizens. This attack happened two years ago. The pro-life community had given the city ample time to resolve this grievance. They failed to address the issue and therefore forced the victims to file a suit in Federal court. This case is the first; there may be others to follow. This is a new era for the pro-life movement and the Pro Life Corner is the place for you to stay informed. ------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------ On Friday April 18, 14 mothers entered Rockford's abortion mill. One mother did stop and take information but still entered the building. On Tuesday April 22, 12 children were aborted in Rockford. A handful of pro-lifers were present to pray and offer help. Expelled Movie Exposes Planned Parenthood's Pro-Abortion M.O. ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Black Pro-Life Leader: Why Are Shepherds Leading the Sheep to Slaughter? ----------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- Women Hurt by Abortion Say Supreme Court was Right - Abortion Causes Severe Depression and Loss of Esteem in Women DALLAS, April 17 /Christian Newswire/ -- Women injured by abortion from all across the country are gathering in Dallas, Texas to celebrate the fact that the Supreme Court recognized abortion hurts women. -------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------- April 15, 2008 (pop.org) - By now, nearly everyone knows that tens of millions of unborn baby girls around the world have been aborted solely because of their sex. Ultrasound technology makes it possible to separate the boys from the girls at 18 weeks or so, and widespread abortion makes it possible to eliminate the less desirable sex, which in most cultures means girls. Up to 200 million girls may have been killed in this way, mostly in Asian and Muslim countries. As America's population of Asians and Muslims continues to grow, we asked in a recent Weekly Briefing, could the same thing happen here? According to a recent study published by the National Academies of Science, is already has. Looking at data from the 2000 U.S Census, researchers noticed a strange phenomenon. The U.S.-born children of Chinese, Korean, and Asian Indian parents tended to be male. The researchers, Douglas Almond and Lena Edlund, called this "son-bia sed se x ratios." Taking their study a step further, they considered the effect of birth order. First-born children of Asians showed normal sex ratios at birth, roughly 106 girls for every 100 boys. If the first child was a son, the sex ratio of the second-born children was also normal. But what happened if the first child was a girl? The second child tended to be a boy. Almond and Edlund found that "This male bias is particularly evident for third children: If there was no previous son, sons outnumbered daughters by 50%." That means that, for every 150 boys, there were only 100 hundred surviving girls. The rest had been eliminated. The authors quite rightly interpret this "deviation in favor of sons" the only way they possibly could, namely, as "evidence of sex selection, most likely at the prenatal stage." In other words, as early as a decade ago, Asian-American communities in the U.S. were already practicing sex-selective abortion. Similar sex imbal a nces have also been documented among Canada’s Asian immigrant communities. The Toronto Globe & Mail reported that “Figures from the 2001 census supplied by Statistics Canada suggest a slight skew in the usual gender ratio among people with South Asian backgrounds. . . . According to the 2001 census data, the proportion of girls under 15 in the South Asian communities of Mississauga and Brampton is two percentage points below the ratio for the rest of the population in those municipalities.” Sex-selective abortion is rightly seen by many as the ultimate form of discrimination against women. Overwhelming numbers of Americans oppose the practice. According to 2006 Zogby/USA Today poll, 86% would like to see it banned. Yet, at present, it remains legal in the U.S. to abort a child for any and all reasons, including the fact that she happens to be a little girl. Senator Jesse Helms (R-NC, Retired) would annually introduce legisl ation banning sex-selective abortions. What is to be done? Some have suggested that the use of ultrasounds to detect the sex of unborn children could be banned. This is a nonstarter. The Chinese government has such a ban in place, and it has proven completely ineffective. Besides, ultrasound technology has been a boon for life. Sonograms have saved the lives of countless mothers and babies in high-risk pregnancies. Employed in crisis pregnancy situations, sonograms have convinced untold numbers of women that they are carrying babies (not ‘blobs of tissue’). For most couples, learning the sex of their unborn child before she was born (as my wife and I did) underlines the personhood of the unborn. It does not provide a pretext for an abortion. I think that the answer lies elsewhere, in a straightforward ban of sex-selective abortion itself. Former Senator Jesse Helms, each year that he was in the U.S. Senate, introduced legislation to ban s ex-sel ec tiv e abortion. The language was simple, yet powerful: “It shall be illegal to perform an abortion for the sole purpose of sex selection.” The evil that Helms sought to preempt has now become a reality. Where is the pro-life champion in the Senate who will carry on Helm’s battle? Where is the legislator who will seek to protect unborn baby girls from the ugliest form of misogyny imaginable, a misogyny that kills? Steven W.Mosher is the President of Population Research Institute. Guatemalans "Dumbfounded" and Angered by International "Culture of Death" login to post comments | printer friendly version | 397 reads
|